French 1001/1002/1022
| Name: ______________________________________ | ||
| GRAMMAR (6 / 3 points possible) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1st Draft | 2nd Draft | |
| 6 / 5 | 3 | No or very few grammatical errors; meaning always clear. |
| 4 | 2.5 | Occasional grammatical errors do not interfere with meaning. |
| 3 | 2 | Frequent grammatical errors sometimes interfere with meaning. |
| 2 | 1.5 | Very frequent grammatical errors often interfere with meaning. |
| 1 / 0 | 1 / 0 | Incomprehensible or not enough material to evaluate. |
| VOCABULARY (6 / 3 points possible) | ||
| 1st Draft | 2nd Draft | |
| 6 / 5 | 3 | Wide range of vocabulary, used appropriately in all instances and with very few or no spelling errors. |
| 4 | 2.5 | Good range of vocabulary, occasional or very few errors in usage or spelling errors. |
| 3 | 2 | Vocabulary somewhat limited; fairly frequent errors in usage and/or spelling. |
| 2 | 1.5 | Very limited vocabulary; frequent errors in usage and/or spelling; literal translations from English. |
| 1 / 0 | 1 / 0 | Extremely limited vocabulary; excessive errors in usage and/or spelling or not enough material to evaluate. |
| STYLE (4 / 2 points possible) | ||
| 1st Draft | 2nd Draft | |
| 4 | 2 | Varied sentence length and structure with some cohesive elements. Descriptive language. Writer's voice engages reader. French is as natural as possible. |
| 3 / 2 | 1.5 / 1 | Information is basic, with little elaboration, sentence variety, or use of cohesive elements. Some interference from English. |
| 1 / 0 | .5 / 0 | Simple sentences with few or no attempts to connect them. Significant interference from English. |
| CONTENT (4 / 2 points possible) | ||
| 1st Draft | 2nd Draft | |
| 4 / 3.5 | 2 | Topic clearly and fully developed. Details, descriptions, examples, and anecdotes explain and clarify information. All task requirements more than adequately fulfilled. |
| 3 / 2 | 1.5 | Topic adequately developed with relevant information and some details. Task requirements adequately fulfilled. |
| 1.5 | 1 | Topic partially developed; some relevant information is missing; few or no details. Task requirements partially fulfilled. |
| 1 / 0 | .5 / 0 | Topic poorly developed and/or task requirements not fulfilled. Or not enough material to evaluate. |
| TOTALS | ||
Department of French and Italian, College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota